Sea Gull
Joined: Jan 29, 2008
Posts: 204
Location: In one of the New England States
Enigmatic Threadkilling Metasyntactic Variable
Joined: May 07, 2008
Posts: 16610
Location: Stendec
Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief
Joined: Feb 13, 2010
Posts: 17232
Location: the island of loveable toy humans
Phoenix
Joined: Apr 03, 2012
Age: 50
Posts: 3182
Location: Seattle, WA
Phoenix
Joined: Jan 06, 2010
Age: 39
Posts: 777
Location: Canada
Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief
Joined: Feb 13, 2010
Posts: 17232
Location: the island of loveable toy humans
Sea Gull
Joined: Feb 28, 2012
Age: 20
Posts: 239
Location: B.C Canada
 Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:49 pm?? ?Post subject: |  | ||
I build pc's and even I enjoy this activity! Funny though, the whole idea is to squish all your files as close together as you can so the head has less distance to travel.. in doing so you will read/write more to certain parts of the hard disk causing wear. But in reality the moving parts will fail way before the disk reaches its read/write limits.. Of course you never want to defrag a solid state drive.. Waste of time and life capacity for it. | |||
Phoenix
Joined: Mar 03, 2010
Posts: 680
Location: Sydney
| Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:51 pm?? ?Post subject: | |
| Nup. No need to. I don't run Windows.
Unix has been storing files without significant fragmentation for decades. Defragmentation is a Windows problem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defragmentation#Approach_and_defragmenters_by_file-system_type Compare "NTFS" (Windows) and "Linux ext2, ext3, and ext4" (the most common Linux file systems). Linux avoids fragmenting files, and rarely needs disk defragmentation - I have never bothered. Windows needs regular defragmentation. | |
Phoenix
Joined: Nov 21, 2008
Age: 36
Posts: 1543
Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief
Joined: Feb 13, 2010
Posts: 17232
Location: the island of loveable toy humans
F?nix
Joined: Feb 20, 2012
Age: 20
Posts: 3456
Location: South America
| Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:58 pm?? ?Post subject: | | ||
I remember I used to do that with the old win 98 defragger I don't defrag very often, really, the computer apparently does it automatically already. Last time I had to defrag it was to shrink a partition to make a new one and put linux on it, there was some mft stuff in the way and it was hell to find the proper tools. Got to admire Fnord's discipline, I only run CCleaner monthly, Spybot like every half a year, and Avast only when I suspect I've catched something. http://ssd-life.com/eng/ssdlife-faq-frequently-asked-questions.html I think I read newer ones didn't have that problem, or at least it wasn't as pronounced, but I haven't really looked into it yet | |||
. It actually showed every single cluster, so it was a really long list.
Sea Gull
Joined: Feb 28, 2012
Age: 20
Posts: 239
Location: B.C Canada
| Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:02 am?? ?Post subject: | |
|
As far as I know, it's the action of the electrons pooling in the substrate in their cells... and they wear down the insulator between pockets eventually. Probably friction.. just very tiny. Same thing can happen to flash drives.. Although it's proper coding now to make sure the software "Write levels" or moves around.. not staying in the same code block for long. That's even important on arduino stuff if you use the built in flash memory. What do I know. It's all amazing is what I gather! | |
Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief
Joined: Feb 13, 2010
Posts: 17232
Location: the island of loveable toy humans
Source: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt225871.html
kirk cousins ovechkin one world trade center bks new dark knight rises trailer khloe and lamar oklahoma city thunder
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.